Skip to main content
AFLAI Fashion Law
← All ArticlesSubscribe
Homedesign

Vicious Candy Showed Up in a Post About Drake. It Deserved Better.

A 2009 post that buried a genuinely interesting Romanian designer under a lot of summer-of-experience journaling. A second look, fifteen years later.

B

By Brooke

Editorial

The original post was titled "When in Romania, Enjoy Vicious Candy and Drake's Mixtape" which is a sentence that could only have been written in 2009 by someone who was twenty-something and had a lot going on that summer.

Three down, six more to go before things settle down — that's what I wrote to open it. I was counting down something, I don't remember what. I had devoted the summer to experience instead of writing. The writing would come later, in the cold Boston winter.

Vicious Candy deserved a better entry point than that.

The brand was Romanian, which in 2009 was a genuinely unusual origin for a label getting attention in the US independent fashion space. Eastern European design was not on the radar of most fashion bloggers. I found it because I was paying attention to things that weren't in the obvious pipeline.

What I wrote about the clothes: colorful, structured, a little aggressive in the best way. The name was accurate. There was something sharp underneath the sweetness. Silhouettes that had opinions.

What I'd add now: Romanian fashion has a distinct textile history that Vicious Candy was drawing on whether explicitly or not. The pattern work, the color relationships — these weren't arbitrary. They came from somewhere.

In 2026, the question of where design references come from has legal weight it didn't have in 2009. The EU AI Act has provisions about training data and cultural heritage. Several Eastern European countries are developing their own frameworks around traditional design motifs and their commercial use.

Designers who knew where their references came from — who could trace the lineage of their aesthetic choices — are in a better position now than designers who borrowed without knowing they were borrowing.

Vicious Candy felt like it knew. The clothes had that quality of grounded reference, even when the context around them was chaotic.

The Drake mixtape was good too, for the record. That part holds up.

Topics

archivesthen-and-nowindependent-designers2009european-designers
B

Brooke

Covers AI law, digital IP, and emerging technology regulation for independent fashion designers. About →

Not legal advice. This is editorial analysis for informational purposes. Consult qualified legal counsel for your specific situation.

← Back to AI Fashion LawGet the newsletter →